Indefinite Detention ?

In 2014 , the Victorian Legislature usurped the Judiciary to overturn Mr Knight’s sentence to condemn Mr Knight into indefinite detention/incarceration (politically motivated by then unelected Victorian Premier Denis Napthine), in so enacting, blatantly violated the Australia Constitution’s prescribed and enshrined Separation of Powers principle underpinning Australian democracy.

Mr Knight challenged this in the High Court of Australia.  This was the High Court ruling against him in 2017.

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [301.02 KB]

Suddenly in November 2023, ‘under new management’, the High Court reversed its decision against ‘indefinite detention’ imposed by the Executive, instead ruling that the Australian Government’s use of indefinite detention was unlawful and unconstitutional, where there was no real prospect that a person’s removal from Australia would be practicable in the reasonably foreseeable future.  This decision is a clear reversal, so upholding the Australia Constitution’s prescribed and enshrined Separation of Powers principle underpinning Australian democracy.

This present clearly justification for Mr Knight to appeal the High Court.  It may never have been done, but Mr Knight is not for one to give up to injustice.

Mr Knight since 2014 is no longer a criminal prisoner, but an extrajudicial political prisoner of the Victorian Legislature.

This is a case where the High Court has been coerced by media shock jocks and politics.  It undermines the Australia public’s trust in the Judiciary to stoop into the “unrepresentative swill” of a state Executive and its Legislature of the day.

 

(content pending)

 

error: Content is protected !!