[The Knighthood’ as collective authors of this herein website, comply with the Australian Copyright Act 1968, No. 63, 1968 (Compilation No. 58) amended from 16th January 2019, Part III, Division 3, Clauses 41, 41A and 42 in our ‘regurgitating’ the cohort of published media outpourings on Julian Knight in this section of this website ‘Media Scrutiny’. We do so for the purpose of review, criticism, satire and correcting the fake news reporting and propaganda. The Knighthood’s critique are included in the context wrapped in square brackets, bold italic text.]
For the most part, the media reporting about Julian Knight, almost to the point of his every move and court hearing, is not objective journalism or news reporting, but typically biased slurs and opinion writing repeated express contempt towards Julian Knight as a co-ordinated political hate campaign against Julian. The plethora of newspaper reporting on Julian Knight reads as a vindictive campaign to throw away the key in contradition to Knight’s judicial sentence. The media are playing the proverbial ‘judge, jury and executioner’. This website has existed since the Victorian Parliament (the legislature) overruled the Judiciary in May 2014; an act of flagrant breach pof the Separation of Powers as enshrined in the Australian Constitution under Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act commenced on 1 January 1901.
In the published accounts of Julian Knight by the ABC media are far from being objective fair journalism, but instead prepared biased opinionated columnist misinformation and bile intended to slur Political Prisoner Julian Knight.
The ABC accounts include those from the following propagandists:
- Elizabeth Burne
- Georgia Hitch
- James Hancock
- Jane Cowan
- Jonathan Holmes
- Mark Russell
- Matthew Doran
- Sarah Farnsworth
